[drats_users] D-RATS 0.3.0b1 (!)

[Andy McMullin]

Dan (et al)

I'd vote for keeping it just like it is. Using filtering on my mail  
client, I don't see any problems with the quantity of mail -- but I do  
sometimes see things I'd otherwise have missed. I think the current  
system is working just fine.

Just my two pennies worth (we don't have cents over here)

--
Regards
Andy McMullin
http://www.rickham.net/



On 14 Apr 2009, at 01:39, Dan Smith wrote:

> Hi Arnold,
>
> I am copying the mailing list on my reply.  I hope you don't mind, but
> I really think this is something that needs to be decided by the
> group.
>
> Arnold said:
>
>> Now that the reporting problem feature is implemented, about 90% of
>> the drats_users email gets instantly deleted by me.  I want to
>> suggest you make a "drats_tester" group or something else for all
>> this stuff.

<deletia>

> By my count, there have been 39 mails related to tickets since April
> 1st.  A good chunk of that is actually discussion around tickets, but
> comes out to an average of 3 per day.
>
> I really don't want to move any serious discussion off to another list
> because I think that's what most people want to see and I don't want
> to require everyone to subscribe to another.  I also don't think there
> is enough discussion to justify two lists.
>
> A lot of communities have an "announce" list where there is no
> discussion, only announcements about releases and important bugs.
> Would it help if I created a "drats_announce" list that I copy on all
> formal and beta release announcements?  Reports from the issue tracker
> and general discussion would not appear on that list, only such
> notifications.  I'd be happy to set this up and think it would be a
> good solution for people looking for a slow trickle of update-type
> information.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/drats_users/attachments/20090414/bf22592e/attachment.html