Thanks for answers.<br>Seems to be good getting this clarified.<br><br>About the semi automatic aspect here, I do interpret your answer Dan, that it is possible to install AN UNMANNED D-Rats station running D-Star somewhere with an internet connection. Hope you find a solution to the mentioned CC problem also.<br>
<br>And that what is needed to be done manually BOTH WAYS is just needed ONLY at the RF only- based manned station in the field.<br>He off course have to SEND is mail adressed to go through the Winlink system.<br>And the same person in the field off course do need to make a poll manually to check for any respons. Like any Winlink client.<br>
<br>Is this conclusion regarding a possibility of an UNMANNED automatic D-Rats gateway correct? :-) (Like kind of RMS D-rats-star) <br>.......................<br><br>Another question because of your own interesting comments somewhere about the fec protection used only in D-star voice parts not activated in the D-star DV Data-part, and thus little robustnes against bit errors in the data segment.<br>
<br>What is the most speedy, and/or most robust mode for a D-Rats station in the field: Thinking of same band in both cases. 2m or 70cm.<br>1: Running D-star down to an unmanned D-rats gateway to internet Winlink?<br>or<br>
2: Running AX-25 with a TNC at the same D-rats station in the field down to a RMS PACKET at the same unmanned internet station?<br><br>Or to be even more radical, (or possibly even more stupid to ask), For such a dedicated DATA-Only frequency:<br>
Is it possible to speed the DV up, by splitting the total amount of data to be transferred into one part in D-Stars digital segment, and the other part DD=>AD and put as sound into D-Stars fec protected Voice segment, and in the other end AD=>DD and merged with the standard data transfer?<br>
Maybe putting Winmor, or AX-25 Packet sounds or whatever into this UNUSED voice part? (On a special dedicated freq. off course)<br><br>73 again de la7um Finn<br>