[drats_users] WIKI & FAQ
Arnold Harding
Sun Apr 19 18:01:06 PDT 2009
OK, for the WIKI, this would be nice. My comments for it below:
> It's been discussed here a couple of times, but not formally
> documented anywhere permanent that I know of.
>
> Here is some explanation of it, grafted from the list archives:
>
> | The pipeline settings shouldn't really affect how things go across
> | the gateway, but they do affect how quickly the file transfer
> logic
> | can recover from a bit of corruption, and how long your radio
> | transmits before asking the remote end for an acknowledgment.
> |
> | The "block size" setting defines the largest chunk of data that
> will
> | be sent with a single checksum. If you have a single bit error,
> | this is the minimum amount of data that will have to be
> | retransmitted. The larger this value, the less overhead, but the
> | more you have to retransmit in the case of a bit error.
> |
> | The "pipeline blocks" setting controls how many of the above
> blocks
> | get sent at a time before asking the remote end for a status
> report.
> | If "block size" is 256 and "pipeline blocks" is 4, then each time
> we
> | transmit, we will send 4x256 = 1024 bytes of data. When those are
> | sent, the receiving side responds with a list of blocks it
> received.
> | If only two of the four were clean, then the sending side sends
> the
> | original two blocks, plus two more (since the pipeline is set to
> 4)
> | and the process repeats.
>
> Note that the "pipeline blocks" setting is the window size. I
> really
> need to rename that in the UI. If the above makes sense perhaps we
> can post it on the wiki somewhere for future generations.
>
Unless it's changed in the 0.3 version, the actual title in the first
'archive' paragraph should be "Transfers" since that's what needs to
get clicked on in the 0.2 versions. I understand it completely. Is
it really possible to make 32 blocks of 4096 bytes? I'd really be
pushing my luck with those settings!
What about Tuning? I don't know about Warmup, and I don't understand
why "Force transmission delay" can have a negative number, or what the
number does at all (seconds? ms? us?).
In the FAQ section "What baud rate should I choose?", the ID-1 has a
baud rate of 19200 (and the port is determined by the USB software).
I know not many of you might use an ID-1 for low speed data, but it
was one of the better choices for our use.
I noticed on the Ratflector web page, sending a Ping to CQCQCQ will
find out who is online. Does this work at all on RF?
Arnold
KQ6DI
More information about the drats_users
mailing list