<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Wingdings;
        panose-1:5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"Cambria Math";
        panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:11.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:#0563C1;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:#954F72;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-compose;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
        color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]--></head><body lang=EN-US link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>As Shon, K2QT mentioned I agree that the Baofeng UV-82 series is a good choice at a low cost.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>They have a good build quality and have a higher duty cycle than the UV5R series.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>(My UV5RV2+ failed during a long rag chewing session, the UV-82 has done fine with similar sessions.)<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>For about $15-$20 more, the UV-82HP has higher power. 7 watts as opposed to 5.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>For a dual band mobile, the Anytone AT-5888UV has 50 VHF and 40 UHF Watts and provides dual watch and some other features, but is ~$290.00.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>There are others in that price range, but the above is the only one I have experienced.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>The low cost radios are lower wattage (which may not matter depending on expected use), I don’t know anyone that has one – so cannot comment on the quality.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>As you mention, if you move away from dual band, Yaesu, Kenwood, etc. can be had for <$175.<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Hard choices, good luck <span style='font-family:Wingdings'>J</span><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>73<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div><p class=MsoNormal>Bill Riess<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><a href="mailto:Bill@BillRiess.com">Bill@BillRiess.com</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Or <a href="mailto:Bill@Riess.us">Bill@Riess.us</a><o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>P: +1 847 394 5312<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>C: +1 847 917 8479<o:p></o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>Callsign: KW9WR<o:p></o:p></p></div></div></body></html>