<html><head><meta content="text/html; charset=us-ascii" http-equiv="Content-Type"></head><body><div><div style="font-family: Calibri,sans-serif; font-size: 11pt;">I agree... In the brand-specific forums, it has been repeatedly stated that these out of band frequency display mods do absolutely nothing to add functionality to a radio even if these mods did do anything other than display a number onscreen, rarely would anyone be legally authorized to operate there. Scanners exist for listening purposes. <br><br>To avoid perpetuating this off topic thread, this will also be my last comment.<br><br>Apologies for not trimming quoted material. Windows phone editors Suck!<br></div></div><hr><span style="font-family: Tahoma,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold;">From: </span><span style="font-family: Tahoma,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">Dan Smith</span><br><span style="font-family: Tahoma,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold;">Sent: </span><span style="font-family: Tahoma,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">4/2/2013 11:41 AM</span><br><span style="font-family: Tahoma,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold;">To: </span><span style="font-family: Tahoma,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">Discussion of CHIRP</span><br><span style="font-family: Tahoma,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt; font-weight: bold;">Subject: </span><span style="font-family: Tahoma,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">Re: [chirp_users] Out of Band freqs memory</span><br><br>Hi Andre,<br><br>I hope this can be our last discussion on this topic.<br><br>> The only problem I "see" is the fact that despite chirp allows us<br>> to "unlock" baofeng, for example (I can set the range from 1 to<br>> 1000mhz), it won't allow me to save those freqs in memory!<br><br>At this point, the mainline version of CHIRP will not gain support for<br>programming frequency ranges that the hardware is known not to support.<br>I have seen no compelling evidence that any version of the hardware is<br>capable of anything outside the range that CHIRP currently supports<br>(aside from the 220MHz variant). Until I do, the current functionality<br>will remain.<br><br>You have brought this up multiple times in multiple places and we<br>have repeatedly explained that we have no interest in features<br>that may be at best useless and at worst damaging. Please, lets put<br>this topic to rest.<br><br>Thanks!<br><br>-- <br>Dan Smith<br>www.danplanet.com<br>KK7DS<br></body></html>