<div dir="auto">Read and write is what Wouxun CPS uses.... but at least adding <div dir="auto">&quot;To radio &quot; or &quot;From Radio&quot;   would help clarify direction of transfer for those less radio/computer literate.   </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">As upload and download are dependent on your perspective.</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, Jan 21, 2023, 3:02 PM  &lt;<a href="mailto:chirp_devel-request@intrepid.danplanet.com">chirp_devel-request@intrepid.danplanet.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Send chirp_devel mailing list submissions to<br>
        <a href="mailto:chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com</a><br>
<br>
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit<br>
        <a href="http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_devel" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_devel</a><br>
or, via email, send a message with subject or body &#39;help&#39; to<br>
        <a href="mailto:chirp_devel-request@intrepid.danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chirp_devel-request@intrepid.danplanet.com</a><br>
<br>
You can reach the person managing the list at<br>
        <a href="mailto:chirp_devel-owner@intrepid.danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chirp_devel-owner@intrepid.danplanet.com</a><br>
<br>
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific<br>
than &quot;Re: Contents of chirp_devel digest...&quot;<br>
<br>
<br>
Today&#39;s Topics:<br>
<br>
   1. Thoughts on upload/download terminology (Dan Smith)<br>
   2. Re: Thoughts on upload/download terminology (Matthew Poletiek)<br>
   3. Re: Thoughts on upload/download terminology (David Boucha)<br>
   4. Re: Thoughts on upload/download terminology (Dan Smith)<br>
   5. Re: Thoughts on upload/download terminology (Jim Unroe)<br>
   6. Re: Thoughts on upload/download terminology (Dan Smith)<br>
   7. Re: Thoughts on upload/download terminology (Martin Cooper)<br>
<br>
<br>
----------------------------------------------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 1<br>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 15:34:14 -0800<br>
From: Dan Smith &lt;<a href="mailto:dsmith@danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">dsmith@danplanet.com</a>&gt;<br>
Subject: [chirp_devel] Thoughts on upload/download terminology<br>
To: chirp devel &lt;<a href="mailto:chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com</a>&gt;<br>
Message-ID: &lt;<a href="mailto:021DF205-CBA7-4BE1-AC1B-F41499FEACB2@danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">021DF205-CBA7-4BE1-AC1B-F41499FEACB2@danplanet.com</a>&gt;<br>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=us-ascii<br>
<br>
Hi all,<br>
<br>
Someone just filed a bug about the fact that CHIRP-next uses only &quot;upload&quot; and &quot;download&quot; in the Radio menu. This wasn&#39;t intentional, but is a departure from what it used to be, which is &quot;Upload TO radio&quot; and &quot;Download FROM radio&quot;. Changing that completely now *might* catch some users off-guard, but I think he&#39;s probably right that the single-word options are too vague.<br>
<br>
Any strong opinions on moving from upload/download (to/from radio), to &quot;Read from Radio&quot; and &quot;Write to Radio&quot;? Even &quot;Read&quot; and &quot;Write&quot; might be okay, given they&#39;re under the &quot;Radio&quot; menu.<br>
<br>
<a href="https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10303?next_issue_id=10301" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10303?next_issue_id=10301</a><br>
<br>
I initially knee-jerked in my usual hates-change way to moving to read/write but perhaps that would be better, and does (I think) match other software.<br>
<br>
--Dan<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 2<br>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 18:22:35 -0600<br>
From: Matthew Poletiek &lt;<a href="mailto:matthew.poletiek@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">matthew.poletiek@gmail.com</a>&gt;<br>
Subject: Re: [chirp_devel] Thoughts on upload/download terminology<br>
To: Dan Smith &lt;<a href="mailto:dsmith@danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">dsmith@danplanet.com</a>&gt;,   chirp devel<br>
        &lt;<a href="mailto:chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com</a>&gt;<br>
Message-ID:<br>
        &lt;<a href="mailto:CAJhSV8uTqcoAk6%2BHDMA5P789t2mw547CETRiqSHSdot6ze6wcQ@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">CAJhSV8uTqcoAk6+HDMA5P789t2mw547CETRiqSHSdot6ze6wcQ@mail.gmail.com</a>&gt;<br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;<br>
<br>
Probably thinking about it too hard myself, but here are some thoughts.<br>
<br>
Upload and download infer a temporary, potentially unstable connection or a<br>
remote/temporary target.<br>
<br>
Read and write infer something less remote and much more stable and<br>
consistent.<br>
<br>
I think upload and download make the most sense for this use case<br>
considering protocols in use and the temporary connection or potentially<br>
unstable one.<br>
<br>
Read and write might set expectations too high for some users.<br>
<br>
2cents.<br>
<br>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023, 17:34 Dan Smith via chirp_devel &lt;<br>
<a href="mailto:chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; Hi all,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Someone just filed a bug about the fact that CHIRP-next uses only &quot;upload&quot;<br>
&gt; and &quot;download&quot; in the Radio menu. This wasn&#39;t intentional, but is a<br>
&gt; departure from what it used to be, which is &quot;Upload TO radio&quot; and &quot;Download<br>
&gt; FROM radio&quot;. Changing that completely now *might* catch some users<br>
&gt; off-guard, but I think he&#39;s probably right that the single-word options are<br>
&gt; too vague.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Any strong opinions on moving from upload/download (to/from radio), to<br>
&gt; &quot;Read from Radio&quot; and &quot;Write to Radio&quot;? Even &quot;Read&quot; and &quot;Write&quot; might be<br>
&gt; okay, given they&#39;re under the &quot;Radio&quot; menu.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; <a href="https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10303?next_issue_id=10301" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10303?next_issue_id=10301</a><br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I initially knee-jerked in my usual hates-change way to moving to<br>
&gt; read/write but perhaps that would be better, and does (I think) match other<br>
&gt; software.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; --Dan<br>
&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt; chirp_devel mailing list<br>
&gt; <a href="mailto:chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com</a><br>
&gt; <a href="http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_devel" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_devel</a><br>
&gt; Developer docs: <a href="http://chirp.danplanet.com/projects/chirp/wiki/Developers" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://chirp.danplanet.com/projects/chirp/wiki/Developers</a><br>
&gt;<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <a href="http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_devel/attachments/20230120/9d2aac93/attachment-0001.html" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_devel/attachments/20230120/9d2aac93/attachment-0001.html</a> <br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 3<br>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 17:49:05 -0700<br>
From: David Boucha &lt;<a href="mailto:boucha@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">boucha@gmail.com</a>&gt;<br>
Subject: Re: [chirp_devel] Thoughts on upload/download terminology<br>
To: Dan Smith &lt;<a href="mailto:dsmith@danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">dsmith@danplanet.com</a>&gt;,<br>
        <a href="mailto:chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com</a><br>
Message-ID:<br>
        &lt;<a href="mailto:CAOWDhxkwwVFsR5EYCHiQxyJbR8R3O_878uZig0mJA8T50OFF8A@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">CAOWDhxkwwVFsR5EYCHiQxyJbR8R3O_878uZig0mJA8T50OFF8A@mail.gmail.com</a>&gt;<br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;<br>
<br>
I&#39;m very accustomed to upload and download terminology, but I&#39;ve always<br>
felt there&#39;s a bit of vagueness or ambiguity to those terms.<br>
<br>
I think switching to read and write technology makes a ton of sense. It&#39;s<br>
very clear and explicit. Zero chance of confusion. I love it. It won&#39;t be a<br>
hard change for users because it makes so much sense.<br>
<br>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023, 4:34 PM Dan Smith via chirp_devel &lt;<br>
<a href="mailto:chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; Hi all,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Someone just filed a bug about the fact that CHIRP-next uses only &quot;upload&quot;<br>
&gt; and &quot;download&quot; in the Radio menu. This wasn&#39;t intentional, but is a<br>
&gt; departure from what it used to be, which is &quot;Upload TO radio&quot; and &quot;Download<br>
&gt; FROM radio&quot;. Changing that completely now *might* catch some users<br>
&gt; off-guard, but I think he&#39;s probably right that the single-word options are<br>
&gt; too vague.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Any strong opinions on moving from upload/download (to/from radio), to<br>
&gt; &quot;Read from Radio&quot; and &quot;Write to Radio&quot;? Even &quot;Read&quot; and &quot;Write&quot; might be<br>
&gt; okay, given they&#39;re under the &quot;Radio&quot; menu.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; <a href="https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10303?next_issue_id=10301" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10303?next_issue_id=10301</a><br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I initially knee-jerked in my usual hates-change way to moving to<br>
&gt; read/write but perhaps that would be better, and does (I think) match other<br>
&gt; software.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; --Dan<br>
&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt; chirp_devel mailing list<br>
&gt; <a href="mailto:chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com</a><br>
&gt; <a href="http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_devel" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_devel</a><br>
&gt; Developer docs: <a href="http://chirp.danplanet.com/projects/chirp/wiki/Developers" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://chirp.danplanet.com/projects/chirp/wiki/Developers</a><br>
&gt;<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <a href="http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_devel/attachments/20230120/01b1a49f/attachment-0001.html" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_devel/attachments/20230120/01b1a49f/attachment-0001.html</a> <br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 4<br>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 17:00:31 -0800<br>
From: Dan Smith &lt;<a href="mailto:dsmith@danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">dsmith@danplanet.com</a>&gt;<br>
Subject: Re: [chirp_devel] Thoughts on upload/download terminology<br>
To: chirp devel &lt;<a href="mailto:chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com</a>&gt;<br>
Message-ID: &lt;<a href="mailto:A8C97CFD-D67E-43A1-8FBD-43215693A599@danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">A8C97CFD-D67E-43A1-8FBD-43215693A599@danplanet.com</a>&gt;<br>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=us-ascii<br>
<br>
&gt; Probably thinking about it too hard myself, but here are some thoughts. <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Upload and download infer a temporary, potentially unstable connection or a remote/temporary target. <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Read and write infer something less remote and much more stable and consistent. <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; I think upload and download make the most sense for this use case considering protocols in use and the temporary connection or potentially unstable one. <br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Read and write might set expectations too high for some users. <br>
<br>
I&#39;m going to go out on a limb and say, from one over-thinker to another, I think you over-thought that real good :)<br>
<br>
Looking at several other packages, here&#39;s what I find:<br>
<br>
KC8UNJ Commander: Read/Write<br>
Kenwood MCP: Read/Write<br>
Kenwood Commercial: Read/Write<br>
Icom CS: Read/Write<br>
Yaesu ADMS: Get/Send<br>
CHIRP-legacy: Download/Upload<br>
<br>
Sure seems like read/write is the more common thing. &quot;Because Yaesu did it&quot; is never a good reason, IMHO, so that&#39;s an easy outlier.<br>
<br>
I think that means read/write would put us on par with most everything else. Anyone else have data points or opinions? Maybe some non-Americans with different connotations for those words?<br>
<br>
--Dan<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 5<br>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 20:14:07 -0500<br>
From: Jim Unroe &lt;<a href="mailto:rock.unroe@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">rock.unroe@gmail.com</a>&gt;<br>
Subject: Re: [chirp_devel] Thoughts on upload/download terminology<br>
To: Dan Smith &lt;<a href="mailto:dsmith@danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">dsmith@danplanet.com</a>&gt;,<br>
        <a href="mailto:chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com</a><br>
Message-ID:<br>
        &lt;<a href="mailto:CADnO8U6jJdnvqMrzw4hHqgoF4G5hX0QyH89taB6MRgJSU83Usg@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">CADnO8U6jJdnvqMrzw4hHqgoF4G5hX0QyH89taB6MRgJSU83Usg@mail.gmail.com</a>&gt;<br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=&quot;UTF-8&quot;<br>
<br>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 6:34 PM Dan Smith via chirp_devel<br>
&lt;<a href="mailto:chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Hi all,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Someone just filed a bug about the fact that CHIRP-next uses only &quot;upload&quot; and &quot;download&quot; in the Radio menu. This wasn&#39;t intentional, but is a departure from what it used to be, which is &quot;Upload TO radio&quot; and &quot;Download FROM radio&quot;. Changing that completely now *might* catch some users off-guard, but I think he&#39;s probably right that the single-word options are too vague.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Any strong opinions on moving from upload/download (to/from radio), to &quot;Read from Radio&quot; and &quot;Write to Radio&quot;? Even &quot;Read&quot; and &quot;Write&quot; might be okay, given they&#39;re under the &quot;Radio&quot; menu.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; <a href="https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10303?next_issue_id=10301" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10303?next_issue_id=10301</a><br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I initially knee-jerked in my usual hates-change way to moving to read/write but perhaps that would be better, and does (I think) match other software.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; --Dan<br>
<br>
For as long as I have been using CHIRP, I have had to help many users<br>
that get the download/upload terminology reversed. To be clearer it<br>
should at least include TO/FROM. For example &quot;Upload TO radio&quot; or &quot;TO<br>
Radio&quot; with the corresponding &quot;Download FROM radio&quot; or &quot;FROM radio&quot;.<br>
<br>
Most factory software that I have used will have a bubble pop up that<br>
just says &quot;read&quot; or &quot;wright&quot; depending on which way the cloning<br>
operation is going. If &quot;Read&quot; and &quot;Write&quot; is decided upon, it might<br>
also be worth changing the hotkeys to &quot;Ctrl-R&quot; and &quot;Ctrl-W&quot;.<br>
<br>
Jim KC9HI<br>
<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 6<br>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 17:20:03 -0800<br>
From: Dan Smith &lt;<a href="mailto:dsmith@danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">dsmith@danplanet.com</a>&gt;<br>
Subject: Re: [chirp_devel] Thoughts on upload/download terminology<br>
To: chirp devel &lt;<a href="mailto:chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com</a>&gt;<br>
Message-ID: &lt;<a href="mailto:ED25026B-382F-4549-88A9-E77AC1376E53@danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">ED25026B-382F-4549-88A9-E77AC1376E53@danplanet.com</a>&gt;<br>
Content-Type: text/plain;       charset=us-ascii<br>
<br>
&gt; For as long as I have been using CHIRP, I have had to help many users<br>
&gt; that get the download/upload terminology reversed. To be clearer it<br>
&gt; should at least include TO/FROM. For example &quot;Upload TO radio&quot; or &quot;TO<br>
&gt; Radio&quot; with the corresponding &quot;Download FROM radio&quot; or &quot;FROM radio&quot;.<br>
&gt; <br>
&gt; Most factory software that I have used will have a bubble pop up that<br>
&gt; just says &quot;read&quot; or &quot;wright&quot; depending on which way the cloning<br>
&gt; operation is going. If &quot;Read&quot; and &quot;Write&quot; is decided upon, it might<br>
&gt; also be worth changing the hotkeys to &quot;Ctrl-R&quot; and &quot;Ctrl-W&quot;.<br>
<br>
OMG, I didn&#39;t think about the crazy hotkey muscle memory I&#39;m going to have to break if we change ;)<br>
<br>
Jim, in your best politician voice, you didn&#39;t actually answer the question, but it sounds like you see more real-world confusion over upload/download than read/write. So I&#39;m going to put down &quot;the senator from the midwest prefers read/write&quot; unless you move to strike... :)<br>
<br>
--Dan<br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
Message: 7<br>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2023 17:53:03 -0800<br>
From: Martin Cooper &lt;<a href="mailto:mfncooper@gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">mfncooper@gmail.com</a>&gt;<br>
Subject: Re: [chirp_devel] Thoughts on upload/download terminology<br>
To: Dan Smith &lt;<a href="mailto:dsmith@danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">dsmith@danplanet.com</a>&gt;,<br>
        <a href="mailto:chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com</a><br>
Message-ID:<br>
        &lt;<a href="mailto:CAGEtHi%2BMB1w21jA9WaB5OkUemiJH2k58W6wjn10NtpJONT5T-g@mail.gmail.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">CAGEtHi+MB1w21jA9WaB5OkUemiJH2k58W6wjn10NtpJONT5T-g@mail.gmail.com</a>&gt;<br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=&quot;utf-8&quot;<br>
<br>
I like upload / download, because it&#39;s consistent with so many other tools,<br>
though not necessarily radio-related tools. I use FileZilla a lot, so I use<br>
upload / download there. Cloud storage systems like iCloud and Google Drive<br>
talk about upload and download. People download photos from their phones to<br>
their computers. I think people are used to upload meaning &quot;send from here<br>
to other place / device&quot; and download meaning &quot;bring to my computer from<br>
other place / device&quot;. I don&#39;t think radios need to be different from those<br>
common usage patterns.<br>
<br>
Martin.<br>
KD6YAM<br>
<br>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2023 at 3:34 PM Dan Smith via chirp_devel &lt;<br>
<a href="mailto:chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; Hi all,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Someone just filed a bug about the fact that CHIRP-next uses only &quot;upload&quot;<br>
&gt; and &quot;download&quot; in the Radio menu. This wasn&#39;t intentional, but is a<br>
&gt; departure from what it used to be, which is &quot;Upload TO radio&quot; and &quot;Download<br>
&gt; FROM radio&quot;. Changing that completely now *might* catch some users<br>
&gt; off-guard, but I think he&#39;s probably right that the single-word options are<br>
&gt; too vague.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Any strong opinions on moving from upload/download (to/from radio), to<br>
&gt; &quot;Read from Radio&quot; and &quot;Write to Radio&quot;? Even &quot;Read&quot; and &quot;Write&quot; might be<br>
&gt; okay, given they&#39;re under the &quot;Radio&quot; menu.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; <a href="https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10303?next_issue_id=10301" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://chirp.danplanet.com/issues/10303?next_issue_id=10301</a><br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I initially knee-jerked in my usual hates-change way to moving to<br>
&gt; read/write but perhaps that would be better, and does (I think) match other<br>
&gt; software.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; --Dan<br>
&gt; _______________________________________________<br>
&gt; chirp_devel mailing list<br>
&gt; <a href="mailto:chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com</a><br>
&gt; <a href="http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_devel" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_devel</a><br>
&gt; Developer docs: <a href="http://chirp.danplanet.com/projects/chirp/wiki/Developers" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://chirp.danplanet.com/projects/chirp/wiki/Developers</a><br>
&gt;<br>
-------------- next part --------------<br>
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...<br>
URL: <a href="http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_devel/attachments/20230120/81d3e2e4/attachment-0001.html" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_devel/attachments/20230120/81d3e2e4/attachment-0001.html</a> <br>
<br>
------------------------------<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
chirp_devel mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com</a><br>
<a href="http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_devel" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_devel</a><br>
<br>
<br>
End of chirp_devel Digest, Vol 141, Issue 10<br>
********************************************<br>
</blockquote></div>