<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<p><font face="Liberation Sans">I get late on the discusion but
agree with the variant or family logic, good point.</font></p>
<p><font face="Liberation Sans">73 Pavel CO7WT</font><br>
</p>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">El 02/07/16 a las 15:46, Dan Smith via
chirp_devel escribió:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:8b33c05b-f16d-02ef-731d-7a137edaf735@danplanet.com"
type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">I would rather use for "clone". Clone sort of implies that one vendor
came out with their radio first and then it was copied by another.
But what happens here is we add support for a radio to CHIRP. Then as
time goes by we come across another radio that happens to program
exactly the same way. Because it got to us 2nd (or 3rd and so on), we
call it a clone of the first radio.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Sure, variant or family sounds fine to me. Excellent point about the
relative ordering of the CHIRP driver vs. actual release :)
--Dan
_______________________________________________
chirp_devel mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com">chirp_devel@intrepid.danplanet.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_devel">http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_devel</a>
Developer docs: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://chirp.danplanet.com/projects/chirp/wiki/Developers">http://chirp.danplanet.com/projects/chirp/wiki/Developers</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
73 Pavel CO7WT.</pre>
</body>
</html>