<div dir="ltr">I meant to attach this but I forgot when my internet went out...<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Jim Unroe <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rock.unroe@gmail.com" target="_blank">rock.unroe@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote">Dan,<br></div><div class="im"><div class="gmail_quote">
<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
VALID_STEPS = [5.0, 6.25, 10.0, 12.5, 20.0, 25.0]<br>
<br>
def get_features(self):<br>
...<br>
rf.valid_tuning_steps = VALID_STEPS<br>
rf.has_tuning_step = True<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div><div class="im"><div class="gmail_extra">I pretty much have this working except for one thing. The drop-down list of steps available appears to be the common list of steps built into CHIRP:<br>
<br>TUNING_STEPS = [<br> 5.0, 6.25, 10.0, 12.5, 15.0, 20.0, 25.0, 30.0, 50.0, 100.0,<br> 125.0, 200.0,<br> # Need to fix drivers using this list as an index!<br> 9.0, 1.0, 2.5,<br>]<br><br>I tried the only other driver that has "rf.has_tuning_step = True" and it does the same thing. Is this a CHIRP bug or am I doing something wrong?<br>
<br></div><div class="gmail_extra">I suppose I could leave it "rf.has_tuning_step = False" since the user has no real need to use tuning steps on the UV-B5 when programming with CHIRP. But I'll wait to see what you have to say about it.<br>
</div><div class="gmail_extra"><br></div><div class="gmail_extra">Jim<br></div></div></div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>