[chirp_devel] Here we go...

[Tony Fuller]

Hey Charlie,


The full build log for the snap might be more interesting than posting the output from pip in this thread. 
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/643304763/buildlog_snap_ubuntu_focal_amd64_e0fec5d9b363f11b29818f8f9274f735_BUILDING.txt.gz

I get the feeling that pip says "error" but doesn't mean "fatal error", if such a distinction still exists today. Pip does continue to install CHIRP (using the legacy setup.py which I think will break soon)

Tony



December 30, 2022 at 8:44 AM, "Charlie Li via chirp_devel" <chirp_devel at intrepid.danplanet.com> wrote:


> 
> Dan Smith via chirp_devel wrote:
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Here's what I'm seeing when snapcraft tries to install CHIRP:
> > >  + pip install -U .
> > >  ...
> > >  Building wheels for collected packages: chirp, future, yattag
> > >  ...
> > >  WARNING: Built wheel for chirp is invalid: Metadata 1.2 mandates PEP 440 version, but 'daily-20221229' is not
> > >  ...
> > >  Failed to build chirp
> > >
> > 
> 
> What's in between the first warning and the failure message? Warnings 
> are just that, and I've still managed to build sdists and bdists despite 
> them.
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > ...
> > >  DEPRECATION: chirp was installed using the legacy 'setup.py install' method, because a wheel could not be built for it. pip 23.1 will enforce this behaviour change. A possible replacement is to fix the wheel build issue reported above. Discussion can be found at
> > >  https://github.com/pypa/pip/issues/8368
> > > 
> > 
> >  
> >  I don't really care that python packaging people think that I should use a version number of the format they chose. It's an application, not a library, built by date, and without any semver guarantees.
> >  
> >  If this becomes a problem then the non-bundled version will need to use a different version from other things, like 1.0.20221225 or something, but until and unless that becomes a hard requirement I don't think it'll be doing anyone any good to be confusingly different. As noted before, 98% of the users consume the bundled builds, and with as many people are using the flatpak type builds (which I'd put in a similar category), that's probably >99%.
> > 
> 
> Many packages just use <year>.<month>.<day> outright for this reason, 
> and it still fits PEP-440.
> 
> -- 
> Charlie Li
> …nope, still don't have an exit line.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> chirp_devel mailing list
> chirp_devel at intrepid.danplanet.com
> http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_devel
> Developer docs: http://chirp.danplanet.com/projects/chirp/wiki/Developers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_devel/attachments/20221230/78582dd3/attachment-0001.html