[chirp_devel] Plans to get the users involved
David Boucha
Fri Dec 16 15:21:22 PST 2022
I think going py3 only asap is the best idea.
Looks great to me!
On Fri, Dec 16, 2022, 3:31 PM Dan Smith via chirp_devel <
chirp_devel at intrepid.danplanet.com> wrote:
> Thanks to everyone that has tried (and/or still plans) to help test the
> new UI and radios under py3. The testing matrix is looking pretty decent:
>
> https://github.com/kk7ds/chirp/blob/py3/tests/Python3_Driver_Testing.md
>
> I know there are still things on there that people here have plans to
> test/fix, so please keep those coming.
>
> With the help of some stats, it looks like we're almost at the point at
> which 90% of the radios that get used regularly are in the "tested" or
> "probably works" category. Honestly, that's higher than I was really
> thinking we'd get, so that's cool.
>
> I like straight edges, right angles, and easy-to-remember dates. So, I'm
> thinking that first thing in January would be a good time to send out
> announcements to the users, looking to expand the testing to a wider
> audience. I think an initial blast to the chirp_users list would be good,
> see how that goes, and then start offering both on the download page.
>
> I also think the plan should be to effectively freeze the py2 branch for
> anything other than bug fixes at that point, and expect all new drivers to
> be against the py3 branch only. I feel like we've got some inertia now and
> we had better capitalize on it. At one point in the past I tried to say
> "new stuff has to work in py3" but I don't think we were close enough to
> really make that work (sorry Rick!). But now I think we've got builds,
> they're clearly usable, and saying that new radios will only be available
> in the new builds is actually reasonable.
>
> If anyone feels this is premature or not the best plan, speak up here and
> we can discuss. Actually, please speak up regardless, even if it's "yes,
> seems reasonable" or "friggin finally". There will be some bumps for sure,
> but I think if people can continue using the legacy builds for radios that
> don't yet work on the new stuff, we should be okay.
>
> I've started generating periodic builds here:
>
> https://trac.chirp.danplanet.com/chirp_next
>
> I've also started on a couple of docs on the website for "why are we doing
> this":
>
> https://chirp.danplanet.com/projects/chirp/wiki/ChirpNextBuild
>
> as well as explaining some differences between the old and new UI:
>
> https://chirp.danplanet.com/projects/chirp/wiki/ChirpNextBuildChanges
>
> If you have comments, edits, or suggestions on these, let me know.
>
> --Dan
> _______________________________________________
> chirp_devel mailing list
> chirp_devel at intrepid.danplanet.com
> http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_devel
> Developer docs: http://chirp.danplanet.com/projects/chirp/wiki/Developers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_devel/attachments/20221216/f611d113/attachment-0001.html
More information about the chirp_devel
mailing list