[chirp_devel] [PATCH 3 of 8] [ft4] Automatic duplex value selection not working. Fixes #7605
Bernhard Hailer
Wed Feb 12 21:13:33 PST 2020
On 06-Feb-20 11:45, Dan Smith via chirp_devel wrote:
>> If you don't min exploring the bandplan usage instead of hard-coding
>> things in as you have them here, that'd be cool. If it's not feasible
>> or easy for some reason, let me know.
I did some research. There are a number of things to consider.
1) Chirp band plans are nice, but incomplete. There's no complete IARU
Region 1 band plan yet (compared to Region 2, where we have
bandplan_na.py extending it to Region 2 VHF/UHF/SHF). I would have to
write a bandplan_eu.py. I might still do that eventually, when I'm too
terribly bored.
2) I loaned an FT-65R from a friend (incidentally, the same one Dan
Clemmensen used for his initial work on the ft4.py driver :-) and
checked what the feature does when I scroll through the bands using VFO.
This is the result:
145.100 - 145.495 neg
146.000 - 146.395 pos
146.600 - 146.995 neg
147.000 - 147.395 pos
147.600 - 147.995 neg
(There is no auto on 70 CM.)
This doesn't match with Chirp's North America band plan. It doesn't
match anything in the European band plan either (the one which might
have to be created in Chirp).
Therefore, I'm afraid that we might have to go with a radio specific
table. Or we make a Chirp Common table (separate from band plans) from
which we could load the ranges for "auto". In that case, it would help
to know how other radios set these values. However, I guess only Yaesu
had this strange idea to save the duplex value as "auto". Insofar, I
think it would be acceptable to keep it in ft4.py.
What do you think? If you agree, then I will modify my patch to reflect
the table above and resend it.
73
Bernhard
More information about the chirp_devel
mailing list