[chirp_devel] [PATCH] [ft4]rework code for progkeys [#6583]

[Dan Smith]

> My apologies. I did not actually intend to commit the directory.register. It was there for testing and I just did not see it. I don't really know to resubmit a patch starting from where I am now, but I will puzzle it out somehow.

If you're using mq, just qpop until the one you want is on top and then "hg email tip" If not, just "hg email $rev" where rev is the thing you want to send.

> Is the .img file acceptable?

I assume? I'll just throw that in the tree when we do register the thing so it'll get tested too.

> About "class scope": it really is an official part of Python: I did not make it up. It's exactly what we wanted to use here: a variable that is only accessible within a class, but not in its superclasses, but is a single variable shared amongst all members of the class.  I am new to Python, so I do not know which language constructs are conventionally simply not used by developers. I will change this to conform to norms. Note that many of the scalars (e.g., MAX_MEM_SLOT) are a class scope, not instance scope.

No, I realize it does work, I'm just saying it's so unconventional I wouldn't have been sure without trying it myself. It's really the self-modification of the class variable during the definition of the class that is weird. If you can just move that part to module scope and then assign it to the class during definition that would be appreciated.

Thanks!

--Dan