[chirp_devel] [PATCH] [New Model] Add Support for Retevis RT23 Radio

[Dan Smith]

>> You mean without these delays in the code, right?
> 
> Yes. No delays. Before I shared the driver to anyone for testing, I
> had none of the delays in the driver because there was no need to have
> it.

Hmm, I'm _highly_ skeptical of why those are required then. If you have
a modern and fast machine and the same radio, you should be stressing
them plenty if there's really a hardware problem.

Anyway, I'd definitely like to see if writing larger blocks between the
sleeps accomplishes the same goal. I'd also be more amenable to merging
the driver without the sleeps (since we know it works on controlled
environments) and then pursue workarounds after the fact. Potentially
getting data from a wider audience could be useful too.

--Dan