[chirp_devel] [PATCH][BTECH] Improved _recv() procedure to be less intensive, fixes #3015

[M.Sc. Pavel Milanes Costa]

El 29/03/16 a las 18:44, Dan Smith via chirp_devel escribió:
>> -    # catching ack
>> >-    ack = _rawrecv(radio, 1)
>> >+    # get the whole block
>> >+    block = _rawrecv(radio, BLOCK_SIZE + 5)
> It's not terrible to read just the ack, especially if you could get back
> a NAK and need to notice immediately. However, unless you were going to
> retry I think reading the ack and the block in one go is better anyway.
>
> I will apply this when you guys say I should.

Nope, the driver is not build to retry so it's safe this way, you can 
apply it safely.

73