[chirp_devel] git vs hg patches [was: [PATCH 1/4] chirp.py: add --list-radios option (#2343)]

[Mathew Mrosko]

Dan,

If you're taking opinions of casual observers, I'm all for moving to
git: github or gerrit.  As silly as the "git vs. mercurial" arguments
usually are, I've always been on the git side of things.  With that,
I've always used an importer to get the latest code into a git repo when
I poke around.  I don't think I've ever contributed so much as a
typo-fix patch to this particular project, so take my opinion for what
it's worth (nothing), but I'm all for a move to git.  I just couldn't
stand to see you and Zach go back and forth without another name in the
mix and thought I'd reply with another +1 for a move to git. ;)

Mat

On 02/24/2015 09:39 AM, Dan Smith wrote:
> ...I think we need to make sure a critical mass is on board before we
> make such a drastic switch.... :) --Dan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> chirp_devel mailing list
> chirp_devel at intrepid.danplanet.com
> http://intrepid.danplanet.com/mailman/listinfo/chirp_devel
> Developer docs: http://chirp.danplanet.com/projects/chirp/wiki/Developers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://intrepid.danplanet.com/pipermail/chirp_devel/attachments/20150224/768d3607/attachment-0001.html