[chirp_devel] [PATCH 3 of 3] Add a test to look for contradictions in radio_features

[IZ3GME Marco]

> I guess I didn't pay attention to the rx_dtcs changes to the wiki when
> you made them, but the "if it has rx_dtcs do X otherwise do Y" logic is
> too confusing.
>

Well ... it's exactly what we have for tones: "if radio has_ctone use X 
else use Y"
Consistency between tones and dtcs is vital from my point of view.

 From the user perspective is not that confusing:
if I see only dtcs column it will be used for all
if I see dtcs and rx_dtcs columns the first will be used for tx and the 
last for rx

Seriously, the only confusing thing I see is that we have "DTCS" mode 
(with a name schema similar to "Tone") and it means "DTCS SQL", if I 
would change something I'd rename "DTCS" to "DTCS SQL" and add a "DTCS" 
with the meaning of tx only.

Your move ...

73 de IZ3GME Marco